An European Union Law Rules European Essay

Get your price

123 writers online


Your site

If there is simply no author, get started the citation with the name. If there is no date of publication, provide the date you accessed that.

Author | ‘title’ | (Website, date) | | accessed

Marilyn Stowe, ‘Divorce petitions: then simply and now’ (Marilyn Stowe, August you 2016) accessed three or more August 2016

‘Europe privileges official tendencies Turkey to heed secret of law’ (BBC, a few August 2016) accessed several August 2016


Skill 90(1) with the Polish Cosmetic, supremacy corthas been accepted on account of the Constitution by itself.

However , nor Art 90(1) nor 91(3) authorized abordnung to an intercontinental organization of the competence to issue legal acts or take decision contract for the constitution. Therefore , the Gloss courts tend not to accept the supremacy of EU rules over its own constitution and also regard national constitutional privileges as a minimum which cannot be questioned as a result of a provision of Community law. Gloss Constitutional Cortexpressly states that the Shine Constitution posseses an absolute primacy over Community law. This may lead to a predicament that all Enhance courts, not only Constitutional Tribunal, will have to disregard some of Community measures so long as they discord with the Polish Constitution. Hence, the courts usually do not accept the EU rules has primacy over its own constitution, and they retain ultimate authority above the issue of whether or not EU rules infringes important rights. guide The case was followed in 1984 by Granital #@@#@!, in which the Italian language Constitutional Court docket ruled that this had the power to suppose upon the basic issue of competence among Community law and nationwide law. Enhance Constitution Tribunal expressly announced that the Gloss Constitution has an absolute primacy over Community law, and it might lead to a situation that most Polish process of law, not only Constitutional Tribunal, will need to disregard some of Community procedures as long as that they conflict together with the Polish Constitution.

Ten key implications intended for UK rules

(1) Farewell to Francovich but a two year grace period for accumulated claims

1st, the Act gets rid of, with some very limited exceptions, any kind of action to getFrancovichinjuries. One of the specific features of EUROPEAN UNION law, considering that the famousFrancovichdecision of the ECJ 20 years ago, was that in case the Government broke EU regulation then a state in injuries would sit if the breach had been adequately serious together caused loss. This is not, however , going to be considered a feature of retained EU law. Timetable 1, section 4 from the Act delivers that[t]here is not any right in domestic regulation on or right after exit working day to problems in accordance with the rule in Francovich. inch

Moreover, this applies even toanything occurring just before exit day time (as very well as whatever occurring upon or after get out of day)(Schedule almost eight, paragraph 39(1)). So evenexistingfactors behind action pertaining to breach of EU legislation are likely to be put out unless possibly (1) actions have been inchstarted, but not finally decided, prior to a the courtroom or tribunal in the United Kingdom just before exit day(Schedule 8, passage 39(3)), or (2) proceedings arebegun inside the period of couple of years beginning with exit day as long as the procedures relate to anything at all which happened before leave day(Schedule eight, paragraph 39(7)).

So there will be, in effect, a two-year grace period approximately March 2021 forFrancovichclaims which in turn accrued just before exit day. But there after we will be to the pre-1991 position.

(2) Simply no future immediate effect of assignments: such effect must have recently been recognised just before exit day

Secondly, retained EU law may have no rof direct effect of directions. Directives are supposed to be given effect by Affiliate States inside their domestic legislation. But if an associate State hascertainly notdone so by the end of the implementation period then a presented directive by itself may be enforced against that Member Condition if completely precise and unconditional. The Act particularly excludes the operation of this doctrine, by following conditions:

  • Directives are not in themselves retained EUROPEAN UNION law: the particular domestic guidelines made to put into practice them (section 2) and any directly effective privileges under such directives already existing before get out of day (section 4(1)). (This is because directives are meant already to become part of UK law due to implementing guidelines. )
  • Section 4(2)(b) prevents any rights arisinga great EU enqu(including as applied by the EEA agreement)if perhaps those privileges arenot of a kind recognised by the European Court docket or any the courtroom or cortin the United Kingdom in a case made a decision before quit day(whether or not as an essential part of the decision in the case).

So any assignments which the UK has transposed inaccurately or perhaps inadequately while at exit day will probably be incapable of providing rise to directly successful rights after exit day time unless the ideal has been previously recognised by the EU or perhaps UK tennis courts. That is thus even though in the event the UK experienced properly executed the directive then the legal rights would already form portion of the law to become continued essentially by section 2 .

(3) Not any future quality challenges: such invalidity should have been accepted before get out of day, subject to further assigned legislation in the future

Thirdly, retained EUROPEAN law will never for least absent future delegated legislation to make provision just for this integrate any rof invalidity. The plan of EUROPEAN UNION law proper is, as with most devices of regulation, a structure or pyramid. The Government arranged this away quite nicely in its Explanatory Notes to the Withdrawal Invoice as it was actually introduced to Legislative house (see passage 42):

Every single level of rules in the pyramid prevails above the lower levels. So if a regulation (level 2) is usually contrary to a general principle of EU legislation (level 1), then it is invalid. This is simply not, however , going to be part of maintained EU legislation. The Action achieves this kind of by the next mechanism:

  • Schedule 1, paragraph 1(1) excludes quality challenges, rendering thatThere is not a right in domestic rules on or after exit time to problem any stored EU rules on the basis that, quickly before quit day, an EU device was broken.
  • Schedule 1, paragraph 1(2)(a) then makes an exception to the ruleso much as the European Courtroom has decided before exit day which the instrument can be invalid. inch

So the fundamental position is that EU legislation is continued or perhaps converted into UK law simply by section 2, 3 and 4, good results . no mechanism for providing effect towards the hierarchy of provisions within this structure of EU regulation. Retained EUROPEAN UNION laws can indeed remain part of household law set up CJEU consequently recognises those to have been broken.

The only exception to this unconventional state of affairs will arise if the Government makes a decision to make rules under Schedule 1, sentences 1(2)(b) and 1(3), which will permit assigned legislation allowing for invalidity issues to retained EU law if they areof a form described, or perhaps provided for, in regulations made by a Minister of the Crown. This kind of regulations may possiblyprovide for a obstacle which will otherwise have been completely against a great EU institution to be against a open public authority in the United Kingdom. The us government therefore has the strength to decide the circumstances, if any, in which the a of retained EU legislation might be able of being announced invalid. Missing such restrictions, no such challenges will probably be possible unless invalidity was recognised before exit working day.

If such regulations are produced, then the Courts will be required by section 6(3) to make the decision any problem as to the quality of stored EU regulationso far as they are relevant to it(a) in accordance with any maintained case legislation and any kind of retained general principles of EU legislation, and (b) having regard (among additional things) to the limits, instantly before quit day, of EU competences. The Government made clear that the reference toEU competencesin this article was placed with a view to the issue of national security: paragraph 106 of the Explanatory Notes for the Bill while introduced relates expressly to Article some of the Treaty and records that countrywide security can be outwith the scope of EU rules.

(4) No more referrals to the CJEU, and no more absolute supremacy for CJEU decisions: not bound simply by any after exit day, and the Great Court and High Courtroom of Justiciary are not bound at all (the test intended for departing is definitely the test put on their own decisions)

Fourthly, our relationship with the CJEU is set to change dramatically. Most naturally, section 6(1)(b) provides that:A court or perhaps tribunal cannot direct any matter to the European Court about or after quit day. Thus there will be simply no references for the CJEU following 29 March 2019.

FurthermoreupcomingCJEU decisions will be simply a discretionary consideration intended for the UK tennis courts. Under section 6(1)(a), a court or tribunalis not really bound simply by any rules laid down, or any decisions made, about or after quit day by the European Court. Such principles and decisions only will be a discretionary consideration, section 6(2) offering that[s]ubject for this and subsections (3) to (6), a court or perhaps tribunalmay include regardto anything done on or after get out of day by the European Court docket, another EUROPEAN entity or perhaps the EU s i9000to far since it is relevantto any matter before the court docket or cort

By contrastpastCJEU decisions on retained EU law known as retained EUROPEAN UNION case law will be binding in all process of law below the Great Court/High Court of Justiciary. Under section 6(4), the Supreme Court/High Court of Justiciary arebound simply by any stored EU case law and deciding if to depart from virtually any retained EU case regulation, eachmust apply the same test as it could apply in deciding if to leave from its own case law(section 6(5)).

(5) The status of retained EUROPEAN UNION law: retained direct main EU legislation, retained immediate minor EUROPEAN UNION legislation and retained EU law by virtue of section 4

Fifthly, we must become used to some new categories of home law. The Act splits retained EUROPEAN UNION law in to three key classes, becoming:

(i)Retained direct principal EUROPEAN legislation, which comprises, broadly, of EU regulations and Commun to the EEA Agreement talking about or adapting such regulations (section 7(6)).

(ii)Retained immediate minor EU legislation, which consists, broadly, of other maintained direct EU legislation e. g. decisions, tertiary laws (section 7(6)).

(iii)Retained EUROPEAN UNION law due to section 4(section 7(4)).

The importance of these categories lies in the actual Government may do to amend all of them, and when, without specific main legislation. In very extensive terms, the first and third classes are made similar to primary laws: they can be modified by delegated legislation only when made beneath the Act itself, or a current recognised Holly VIII power (section 7(2), (4)). By contrast, the second category can be customized by virtually any existing or perhaps future power to make, verify or say yes to subordinate guidelines (section 7(3) and Routine 8).

(6) Superiority of EUROPEAN law, nevertheless only more than pre-exit time laws

Sixthly, the doctrine of supremacy of EU law will have zero application to laws approved after quit day. Below section 5(1), theof the supremacy of EU legislation does not apply to any achievement or guideline of regulation passed or made upon or after get out of day. inchesTherefore post-exit time laws will require precedence over retained EUROPEAN law although what sort of post-exit time law is important to trump retained EU law will depend on which class of retained EU regulation it is, since explained previously mentioned. As to pre-exit day household laws, theof the superiority of EU law continues to apply about or after leave day in terms of relevant to the interpretation, disapplication or quashing of any kind of enactment or perhaps rule of law approved or made before quit day(section 5(2)).

(7) Continued Treaty Articles about free movement, state aid etc but how can they job?

Seventhly, the tennis courts will have to make an effort to make sense of numerous laws that happen to be difficult to interpret or apply as home-based UK laws and regulations. As described above, section 4(1) gives that[a]ny rights, powers, liabilities, obligations, restrictions, remedies and proceduresrecognised and available by virtue of section 2(1) ECA 1972continue on and after exit time to be recognised and obtainable in domestic law. The Government’s Informative Notes towards the Bill gave a non-exhaustive list of some 28 such directly successful rights which the Government looks at will therefore be converted into provisions of domestic UK law, which includes Articles 34 (free movements of goods), 101-102 (the competition rules) and 107-108 (state aid) TFEU. The non-exhaustive list of 28 legal rights includes many of the most important rights under the Treaties, which are indeed the conceptual underpinnings from the entire scheme of EUROPEAN law: nondiscrimination, free activity, the competition guidelines, state aid and the suchlike.

The problem is that all few in the event that any of these privileges, read straightforwardly and on their particular face, produce much feeling as conditions of UK law applicable only in the UK. How will these are domestic laws of a nation which is no more a Member State? Take as an example Article 107 TFEU, which can be the forbidance on condition aid. It offers that:

help grantedby a Affiliate Stateor through State solutions in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain companies or the development of specific goods shallin so far as it influences trade among Member States, be antagwith the interior market.

This supply will, simply by operation of section 4(1) of the Action, become a household law in the UK which has a status similar to primary legal guidelines. But as can be seen from the emboldened words, that makes very little sense being a law of your state which is not a Member State of the EUROPEAN or part of the internal industry. Read virtually, this rules would have attained something comparable to Sir Ivor Jennings’ famous example of Parliament legislating to outlaw smoking on the streets of Paris. The UK may have legislated to generate it against the law as a couple of UK law for England to scholarhip a state aid to an starting in a way which in turn affects trade within an inside market of which the UK has ceased to be a part.

The instinctive response of a court might well end up being to say that a person should merely read Member States while meaning great britain, trade among Member States as that means trade within the UK and the inner market while meaning the market inside the UK. But this would possess a remarkable effect on legislation of condition aid as it currently is applicable in the UK. Since things stand, there is no EUROPEAN law prohibition on state aids which have a strictly internal effect (see elizabeth. g.R sixth is v MAFF you CMLR two hundred fifity at per Laws and regulations J). A tiny local specialist grant to improve a privately-run local facility is less likely to engage EU law. On the alternative studying of this supply which might be instructed to make sense of computer as a UK law, this might no longer be the case.

The problems become even more acute when a single turns towards the Treaty conditions on free of charge movement. Exactly what are the Courts to make of a piece of UK legislation which offers that[q]uantitative restrictions on imports and all actions having equivalent effect should be prohibited among Member States(Article 34 TFEU, which will be taken into UK law simply by section 4)? There are certainly all sorts of conceivable solutions, nevertheless the Act in itself offers zero guide to the Courts to make the delicate policy decisions which come up.

In truth, the only solution to this problem will probably lie in delegated legislation. And so all of us turn to the powers for making delegated guidelines conferred by the Act.

(8) The critical importance of delegated legislation, and the position of judicial review

Eighthly, assigned legislation will be of essential importance. Section 8 from the Act is usually entitledDealing with deficiencies as a result of withdrawal. It permits a Ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) of the Overhead, by restrictions, to:

this sort of provision while the Ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) considers appropriate to prevent, cure or mitigateany failing of retained EU rules to operate properly, or (b) any other deficit in retained EU legislation, arising from the withdrawal from the United Kingdom from the EU. inches

The sheer breadth of this supply becomes obvious from the really long meanings of deficiency in areas 9(2) and 9(3) with the Act:

(2) A reduction in retained EUROPEAN law will be where the Minister considers that retained EUROPEAN law(a) contains whatever which has no program in relation to britain or any a part of it or perhaps is otherwise redundant or substantially redundant, (b) confers functions upon, or in relation to, EU entities which will no longer have functions in that respect under EU rules in relation to britain or any element of it, (c) makes dotacion for, or perhaps in connection with, reciprocal arrangements between(i) the United Kingdom or any a part of it or possibly a public authority in the United Kingdom, and (ii) the EU, an EU business, a member Express or a open public authority in a member Condition, which no more exist or are no longer suitable, (d) makes provision for, or regarding the, other arrangements which(i) involve the EU, a great EU entity, a member Condition or a general public authority in a member Express, or (ii) are in any other case dependent upon the United Kingdom’s membership with the EU, and which not anymore exist or are no longer appropriate, (e) makes provision for, or regarding the, any testing or additional arrangements certainly not falling within just paragraph (c) or (d) which not anymore exist, and/or no longer appropriate, as a result of the uk ceasing to be a party to one of the EU Treaties, (f) does not contain any functions or perhaps restrictions which(i) were in an EUROPEAN directive and force instantly before exit day (including any capacity to make EUROPEAN UNION tertiary legislation), and (ii) it is suitable to retain, or (g) includes EU recommendations which are no more appropriate.

(3) There is also a deficiency in stored EU law where the Minister considers that there is(a) anything at all in retained EU legislation which is of the similar kind to any insufficiency which declines within subsection (2), or (b) a deficiency in retained EUROPEAN UNION law of the kind referred to, or provided for, in restrictions made by a Minister with the Crown. inch

These definitions of adeficiency in stored EU lawwill tend to be engaged by many pieces of stored EU legislation. The possibilities can range from totally banal scenarios such as the need to change the names of particular institutions or organisations proper the way to needing completely to recast an important Treaty provision which usually simply makes no impression as a supply of UK law.

In principle, delegated legislation is capable of being afflicted by judicial review on common public regulation grounds: see e. g.Ur (Javed) v Secretary of State for home use Department QB 129. Offered the scale with the delegated legislative exercise probably be necessary to make retained EUROPEAN law job, judicial review may offer an important role.

(9) General rules of EU law

Ninthly, the operation from the general principles of EUROPEAN law will very likely be highly different. The overall principles happen to be first iced in time: Schedule 1 section 2 prohibits the recognition of any basic principle of EU rules after quit dayif it absolutely was not recognized as a general principle of EU regulation by the Western Court in a case decided before exit day. The operation of the standard principles can now be severely curtailed. Whilst the interpretation and effect of retained EU legislation is to be made the decision in accordance with theretained general guidelines of EU law(section 6(3)(a)), the Work also supplies that:

  • There is no correct of actions on or after exit day timebased on a failing to conform to any of the basic principles of EU law(Schedule 1, passage 3(1)).
  • Simply no court or perhaps tribunal or perhaps public expert may disapply or overthrow any enactment or guideline of law or decision, or make a decision that it is outlawedbecause it is contrapuesto with one of the general principles of EUROPEAN UNION law(Schedule 1, paragraph 3(2)).

The overall principles will be therefore being frozen within their development and after that reduced, in essence, to an interpretative aid.

(10) Farewell to fundamental rights

Tenthly, the Charter of Fundamental Rights will not be a part of retained EUROPEAN law (section 5(4)). This is certainly so while the purpose of the Charter was, as the Supreme Court has recognizedthe assembly within a instrument of those fundamental privileges which Eu law had previously determined in legal guidelines or in decisions of the CJEU(RFU versus Viagogo you WLR 3333 at per Head of the family Kerr). The exclusion of the Charter will not, howeveraffect the retention in domestic regulation on or right after exit day in accordance with this Act of any fundamental rights or principles which exist in spite of the Charter(section 5(5)). The question whether a particular right exists no matter its identification in the Rental is consequently likely again, as it was prior to the Lisbon Treaty, to become essential.


Regardless of the constitutional doctrine manufactured by the ECJ, the superiority of EU law is definitely not satisfactorily implemented inside the member declares. They still locate the authority of EU regulation in the nationwide legal purchase centrally inside the national cosmetic and not in the jurisprudence of the ECJ or perhaps in the sovereignty of the EUROPEAN. reference The legal character of the EU is the important reason for this example as the decisions of the ECJ are not legally capturing on nationwide courts of member states among the EUROPEAN UNION. Reference Coming from different member’s perspective, we can see that there is a conflict in between the Cosmetic and the ECJ’s law. We can therefore conclude that people do not really obey and adopt the supremacy doctrine. However , the European Court docket of Justice is attempting to make an effort his far better urge the member to follow it.


Duke School Libraries on a regular basis add new solutions to our collection. The following non-comprehensive list of related subject titles will help you search the online catalog (search. selection. duke. edu) for additional supplies.

  • Administrative procedure-European Union countries
  • Court of Justice of the European Residential areas
  • European Union
  • Eu countries
  • Totally free trade-European Union countries
  • Regulation – European Union countries
  • Economic policy-European Union countries

ECJ circumstances

Case Quantity |Case Term| ECLI quotation, | Survey citation

ECLI citation = Region | Court | Year | Case quantity

ECLI (European Case Rules Identifier) can be described as new case law metadata standard and is also similar to a UK neutral citation. It is not well known, and not at the moment part of OSCOLA (so may be omitted), though is covered in OSCOLA’s FAQs.

ECR citation sama dengan [Year] | ECR | Volume- | Page amount

CMLR citation = [Year] | Quantity | CMLR | Page number

Where possible refer to cases through the European Court docket Reports initial, then Prevalent Market Legislation Reports, or perhaps other key series.

In the event that pinpointing to a paragraph amount, use the prefix para instead of [brackets].

In the bibliography, reorder the citation simply by case brand first, then simply case amount and quotation.

Case in point

Footnote: – Circumstance C-607/11ITV Broadcasting Ltd v TV Catchup LtdEU: C: 2013: 147, several CMLR 1 .

If pinpointing: – Circumstance C-607/11ITV Broadcasting Ltd sixth is v TV Catchup LtdEU: C: 2013: 147, three or more CMLR 1, paras 30-36.

Case identity given in essay: – Case C-607/11, EU: C: 2013: 147, 3 CMLR 1

Short form: –ITV Broadcasting Ltd(n #).

Bibliography: – ITV Broadcasting Limited v TV Catchup Limited (Case C-607/11) EU: C: 2013: 147, 3 CMLR 1

Short varieties and ibids

The first time you reference a source, full details should be given in the footnote. To getsubsequent citations, ashort formof the reference may be given, followed by a combination reference (in brackets) to the fully referenced footnote. Intended for cases the short kind is normally the initially party name, and for catalogs and content articles the author’s surname. In the event you refer to a similar work in the immediately following footnote, you can useibid(an decrease of the Latina ibidem, that means ‘in a similar place’), rather than the short type. Page quantities can also be used towards the end of short forms and ibids.

Example(Where footnote 3 refers to footnote a couple of; and footnote 4 refers to footnote 1)you Richard Oranges and Graham ShieldsCite all of them right: the essential referencing guideline(9th edn, Palgrave Macmillan 2013).

2 Mack WebleyLegal Producing(3rd edn, Routledge 2013).

some Pears and Shields (n 1).

Standard guidelines

Beneath the OSCOLA guidelines, each expert should be mentioned in a constant, uniform fashion. The different categories of sources happen to be cited in several formats. Just before examples are given, some basic rules should be mentioned:

  • The footnote should appearfollowingthe relevant punctuation inside the text, unless of course for quality it is necessary to put it directly following word or perhaps phrase
  • If the offered phrase/idea is inside mounting brackets, the footnote should be prior to the closing group
  • Punctuation in info are little, for example , UKHL rather than U. K. L. L.
  • Footnotes needs to be closed which has a full stop
  • Titles of books an incident names are to be italicised
  • Semi-colons may be used to separate a reference to two different sources in a footnote
  • Quotes longer than three lines should be provided within an indented paragraph with no quotation represents

III. Treatises

Klaus-Dieter BorchardtThe ABC of Community RulesEUROPEAN publication that reviews the beginning of the Euro project throughout the creation from the EU and explains the broad concepts and legal order which will make the foundation of the EU; designed for download as a PDF throughout theEU Bookshop.

European Union Legislation Guide(Philip Raworth, male impotence. ) (KJE949. E97 1994) an accumulation documents prepared by subject, and it is current several times a year.

Ralph They would. FolsomEu Law in summary, 8th education. (Reserve KJE949. F55 2014) a fundamental introduction to Eu law.

Trevor C. HartleyThe Foundations of Western Community Rules, 7th ed. (KJE947. 2010) offers an introduction to the constitutional and administrative law of the EC.

P. H. R. Farrenheit. Mathijsen & P. DyrbergMathijsen’s Guide to European Union Legislation(11th impotence. ) (KJE947. M37 2013) details the history and development of the EU and covers current policy, composition, and the EU’s role in international relationships.

The Oxford Handbook of European Union Regulationcovers the EUROPEAN from creation through modern challenges and debates.

Smit & Herzog on the Rules of the European Union(formerly Regulation of the Western european Economic Community: A Commentary on the EEC Treaty) (KJE964. S652 & online in Lexis Advance) an authoritative treatise, in biannually updated looseleaf format, with an focus on the nature and scope of EU legislation.

IX. STUDY GU >ESODetails Guides– guides in order to research EUROPEAN law in a series of different areas.

Duncan Alford & Alyson DrakeEuropean Union Legal Supplies: An Occasional User’s Guideline, GLOBALEX (2016) offers advice about locating and understanding EU documents.

Meat OveryEu: A Guide to Doing a trace for Working Papers, GLOBALEX an complex guide in researching the context, history, and transactions surrounding the introduction of EU files.

Marylin J. RaischEu, ASIL ELECTRONIC DIGITAL RESOURCE GUIDEBOOK (ERG) this guide delivers explanation of EU method and framework and take into account online resources to get official files and shows some useful print methods.

Foreign Legislation Guideprovides advice about the legal devices of countries all over the world and info to their legal publications; provides a section within the European Union.


The ECJ proven principle of supremacy at the 1960s, in addition to case of incompatible results in the application of equally legal systems to the same situation, the contradictory national law of member states become irrelevant. This means that anytime there is a discord between a national rules and EUROPEAN UNION law, the judge must first offer immediate impact to EU law. EU law rules over countrywide law.

This leads to a duplicity between the ECJ and affiliate states exist; ECJ stimulates that the supremacy of EUROPEAN law, although member declares do not recognize the superiority doctrine totally. Member claims do not treat the EUROPEAN UNION law while unconditional and they claim that it truly is themselves that retain a definitive capacity to rule on the competence between EU Regulation and countrywide law. EU law has supremacy more than national statues, but then again are unable to conflict with constitution in each of member claims. Also, the national legal courts think that that they hold a great ultimate capacity to rule in conflicts among EU rules and nationwide law, not the ECJ.


Short quotes(up to three lines of text), should be designed into the text message, within ‘single quotation marks’;ttonger quotations(over three lines of text), needs to be presented in an indented passage, without quotation marks. Most q uotations should be referenced by a footnote, and the page number of the quotation ought to be indicated at the conclusion of the footnote.

Quotations from all other works has to be faithful towards the original, besides where you need to change quotation marks coming from single to double, or vice versa. In the event that some terms are lacking from the estimate, or if this ends mid sentence inside the original text, use an ellipsis (. ) to indicate that some of the offer is missing.

< Prev post Next post >